At 02:14 PM 4/1/2011 -0400, Carl Meyer wrote:
But, as I mentioned, the fact that easy_install itself relies on finding
site-packages relative to sys.prefix forces the issue - easy_install
(including existing versions of it) needs to just work.
No, it doesn't, actually.
easy_install only uses sys.prefix to identify "site" directories
without having to test them. Its install paths actually come from
the distutils -- so as long as the distutils "install" command has
the right defaults, easy_install will work just fine. (Assuming
sys.executable is correct.)
What easy_install does if it's asked to install to a directory that:
1) doesn't look like a site directory (based on sys.prefix), and
2) isn't listed in --site-dirs on the command line or in the config files,
is that it runs a test (using sys.executable) to see if .pth files
are actually supported in that directory.
So, if sys.prefix leads it to believe that the distutils-supplied
target directory isn't really a "site" directory, it checks for
itself whether it functions as a site directory.
In other words, easy_install will run a bit slower in such a scenario
(due to the extra time taken to test), but still function
correctly. To stop it taking the extra time for the test, an
additional command line option or configuration file option can be given.
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig