Hi,
Le 06/06/2012 10:52, Benoît Bryon a écrit :
Le 31/05/2012 18:00, PJ Eby a écrit :
You've definitely put in a lot of work on this, and most of the
actual guidelines in your PEP are quite good. I think there's a core
part of this that can and should be a good Informational-track PEP.
If it actually becomes a draft PEP, I guess we should:
* move the document in PEPs' repository
* add notes in Python packaging documentation to reference the PEP.
Updated
https://bitbucket.org/benoitbryon/cpython/src/doc-package-names/Doc/packaging/packagenames.rst
Prepared migration to a PEP.
I am to submit the document for review at [email protected]. Feedback is
welcome!
Le 06/06/2012 10:52, Benoît Bryon a écrit :
Also, I propose to shorten or move the "terminology" section in
another document (another pep or in packaging documentation):
* it would simplify the document
* we'd better share the terminology between several documents.
Moved terminology section to packaging/introduction.rst.
See
https://bitbucket.org/benoitbryon/cpython/changeset/5eca478e6804#chg-Doc/packaging/introduction.rst
Benoit
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
