On 9/13/12 3:21 AM, SAn wrote:
On Wed Sep 12 19:47:39 CEST 2012, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
That said, this doesn't match my workflow at all. After releasing
"1.0" the next version is going to be "1.1", and any development
pre-release will be "1.1.devX". "1.1a" might not ever even exist. I
think others brought up this critique at the time PEP 386 was being
discussed, but then nothing was ever done about it >_>
Yea, this concerned me because 1.1.devX < 1.1a1 < 1.1b1 < 1.1c1 < 1.1
is how i've seen it used in the wild. Looks like most everyone i've seen
using it so far has been doing it wrong. Don't think ive seen a single
person do it right.
Hi, just yesterday i got bitten by this issue. FYI:
# verlib "pep386" (from https://bitbucket.org/tarek/distutilsversion)
you should use the one at
http://hg.python.org/distutils2/file/0291648eb2b2/distutils2/version.py
for all your tests, and file bugs at bugs.python.org
verlib is an old version and is properly a bit different
Cheers
Tarek
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
