On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Daniel Holth <[email protected]> wrote: > -1 The same arguments will just be repeated again.
I'm not so sure - at the moment, I'm basically saying "trust me, I have a plan for this". I do have a plan, and I've shared bits and pieces of it with different people, but not put any of it together as coherent proposals (not even as an essay on python-notes, which is what I'm working on now). So I guess I'm really asking if there are any major plans people have for the next month or so that hinge on using PEP 426 metadata rather than setuptools metadata? If not, I think it's worth my taking the time to give the PEP more context. Rolling out wheel support should be enough to keep people busy for a while... Cheers, Nick. > On Feb 20, 2013 4:45 AM, "Lennart Regebro" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Thoughts? >> >> +1 >> _______________________________________________ >> Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
