On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 28 February 2013 06:07, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> It's certainly true that the ABI flags are incomplete (there's also >>> the whole stable ABI to consider). >> >> The stable ABI is covered in PEP 425: the stable ABI compatibility tag >> is "abi3", and you use the Python version tag to indicate the minimum >> required Python version. What part do you feel we missed? > > You're confusing the tags here. cpXX is the "python" tag, which would > be the same for both stable and normal ABI. The ABI tag for the normal > ABI is "none". I'd missed the fact that the PEP specifies "abi3" for > the stable ABI.
Almost completely right. Technically the ABI for the normal ABI is also something like cp33d (d = "with debug"). The scheme is supposed to be similar to the filenames inside __pycache__ and of C extensions and is backported to Python 2.7. We don't generate these correctly at least for Python 2 in the wheel reference. _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
