-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/28/2013 04:32 PM, PJ Eby wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> > wrote: >> On Mar 28, 2013, at 3:39 PM, PJ Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote: >>> Can we do it by just dropping catalog-sig and keeping >>> distutils-sig? I'm afraid we might lose some important >>> distutils-sig population if the process involves renaming the >>> list, resubscribing, etc. I also *really* don't want to >>> invalidate archive links to the distutils-sig archive. >>> >>> All in all, +1 on not having two lists, but I'm really worried >>> about "breaking" distutils-sig. We're still going to be talking >>> about "distribution utilities", after all. >> >> Worst case I'm sure subscribers can be transferred and the existing >> archive kept intact. > > That's a great way to have a bunch of people complaining that they > never subscribed to packaging-sig, not to mention the part where it > breaks everyone's mail filters. > > I really don't see any gains for renaming the list. It's not like we > can go and scrub the entire internet of references to distutils-sig.
Not to mention breaking the gmane.org gateway, and those of us who sip the firehose there instead of trying to swallow it via e-mail. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlFUuS4ACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4zXACguC0D2F3EEE7GT4DGXRa08hy7 FdYAoM56YpHef9J0ScKOdY2OHv/48LOv =3UtH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
