On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Lennart Regebro <rege...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm -1 on anything that doesn't involve at least a minimal level of human >> involvement (possibly excepting an initial clean up exercise for projects >> with no author email) > > This is why I basically said I'm OK with automatic deletion after a > time if there are no downloadable packages and no contact information. > Otherwise the owner should be contacted.
Some people are saying "files uploaded" vs. "downloadable packages". I don't like the "files uploaded" criterion because IMO it's a perfectly valid use case to list a package on PyPI which is only available via external revision control. Heck, a project that only has planning documents and a reasonably active mailing list should still qualify for PyPI listing, else the original distutils-sig would not have qualified for reserving the name "distutils" on PyPI, before its first release. ;-) _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
