Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan <at> gmail.com> writes:
> No, because the semantic dependencies form a Cartesian product with
> the extras. You can define :meta:, :run:, :test:, :build: and :dev:
> dependencies for any extra. So if, for example, you have a "localweb"
> extra, then you can define extra test dependencies for that.
>
> The semantic specifiers determine *which sets of dependencies* you're
> interested in, while the explicit extras define optional subsets of
> those.
Isn't that the same as having an additional field in the dependency mapping?
It seems like that's how one would organise it at the RDBMS level, anyway.
{
"install": "localweb-test-util [win] (>= 1.0)",
"extra": "localweb",
"environment": "sys_platform == 'win32'",
"kind": ":test:"
}
Sorry if I'm being dense :-(
Regards,
Vinay Sajip
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
