On Jun 30, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Gabriel de Perthuis <g2p.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 18:46:51 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote: >> On Jun 30, 2013, at 6:39 PM, Gabriel de Perthuis <g2p.c...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> So it would prefer that dev and test be extras with well known names, >>> so that dev, test, and any other extras define dependencies with a >>> minimum of ambiguity and without the need for a second level of >>> qualifiers. >> >> "Well known names" is way more ambiguous than a top level field. >> It's easy to have minor variances across various packages, "test" vs >> "tests", "docs", "doc", "documentation". Both top level and "kind" >> share the fact that there is a limited number of allowed names, >> which makes it simple to validate that the same name is being used >> everywhere (because anything outside of those limited numbers are >> rejected). > > These well-known names would also have some tool support. > Something like `pip install-dev` would be sufficient. > > > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig But when defining them, it's very easy to accidentally use "tests" instead of "test". ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
