On 18 July 2013 17:50, Vinay Sajip <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It's for more reasons than it's in the standard library. setuptools has
>
>> had a lot of misfeatures and a good bit of the angst against not using
>> setuptools was due to easy_install not setuptools itself.
>
> It's hard to disentangle the two - it's not as if the easy_install 
> functionality is completely separate, and it's possible to change its 
> behaviour independently. Another thing about setuptools which some don't 
> especially like is that generated scripts reference pkg_resources, for no 
> particularly good reason.

It would actually be nice if "pkg_resources" and "setuptools-core"
were available as separate PyPI distributions, and setuptools bundled
them together with easy_install. It's a *long* way down the priority
list thing (and will likely never make it to the top, although it may
be more practical once pip vendors the bits it needs).

Cheers,
Nick.

--
Nick Coghlan   |   [email protected]   |   Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to