On 31 July 2013 05:15, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: [...] +1. This sounds like a good plan
I do not want a packaging index server to be specified by implementation, > so as > the legacy API is ported over to Warehouse a specification will be > drafted. This > spec will represent the "promise" that PyPI makes about the API it > presents to be > consumed by machines. During the migration any behavior not codified > inside of > the spec is considered implementation defined behavior and backwards > compatibility > for that behavior will not be promised. > And this is something I wholeheartedly support - having a properly specified PyPI API will not only help protect against future changes, it will also ensure that people writing their own index servers have a well-defined spec to work to. Paul
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig