On 22 August 2013 16:04, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote: > The next step is up to the pip folks - if they think adopting distlib > wholesale makes sense for them, fine, I have no direct say in that. If > they decide to make a "piplib" instead, to expose a public API for an > updated version of pip's own infrastructure (perhaps derived from > distlib), that's fine by me, too. >
For what it's worth, we currently have a vendored copy of distlib bundled into pip but (a) it's pretty out of date now and (b) we only make minimal use of it - in particular we do not use it for any of the wheel support at the moment. I don't have any feel for what we might do going forward - I suspect we'll wait until the dust settles a bit on the whole issue in distutils-sig before trying to make a decision. For virtualenv, I have a longer-term plan to switch to bundling pip and setuptools wheels instead of sdists, but again I don't plan on rushing into a decision on how I'll do that. Paul
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
