On Aug 25, 2013, at 4:02 AM, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
> My main concern is that for people who *don't* need multi-versioning, or who > only use it for one or two special cases, there is no detrimental impact on > user interface or runtime (the "if you don't use it, you don't pay for it" > principle). A lot of the FUD around setuptools' multi-versioning was around > precisely this point (path munging, etc) and I want to understand how the > proposed solution avoids repeating those problems (to the extent that they > were real and not imagined). Yea my primary concerns is that the cost is paid only by those who use the feature and to make sure it's not something that's the way it works isn't going to leave us regretting the decision down the road. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
