On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Vinay Sajip <vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > -------------------------------------------- > On Thu, 2/1/14, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dariusz Suchojad suggested it might be easier if there was a > > suitable classifier to mark such modules rather than trying to keep a > > list on the wiki up to date by hand. Perhaps something like > > "Progamming Language :: Python :: Standard Library"? > > I think it makes sense to have > > "Progamming Language :: Python :: Backport" > > and > > "Progamming Language :: Python :: Backport :: Standard Library" > > While we're on the subject of classifiers, IMO it would also be helpful to > be able to identify (the growing number of) projects which are 2 and 3 > compatible without the need for 2to3 to be run. So perhaps > > "Progamming Language :: Python :: Python2and3" > > or some such. > How is that any better than specifying the Python 2 classifier and the Python 3 one? One should specify every individual version of Python that a project is supposed to be compatible with anyway so I don't see the benefit of knowing through a classifier if 2to3 is needed or not.
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
