On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 08:01 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote: > > On Sep 16, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > > One thing that might be worth clarifying somewhere/somehow (not > > particularly in the specs, though) is where is the best place to find > > the "canonical" implementations of the various metadata specs. At one > > point, distlib seemed to be taking that role, but I'm not sure it is > > any more. Is that the role the "packaging" project is now taking on? > > This is where I think it's a shame that this infrastructure isn't > > being added to the stdlib - ... > I’m hesitant to include any of this stuff in the stdlib as of right now. It > wouldn’t > have helped you here since PEP 440 wasn’t approved until after 3.4 was out > so the earliest it would be in is Python 3.5. Perhaps once we have most of > the pieces fitted together and working sanely it would be a good time to > figure out what, if any should be moved to the stdlib.
I suggest to rather list good PEP-implementing modules/packages on some "pypa" PEP-independent administered page and reference that page prominently. Given that we have a mixed py27/py3 python ecosystem and will do so for some more years, and given that things are still moving, focusing on adding such to the stdlib is wasted effort IMHO. best, holger _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
