On September 29, 2014 at 8:54:26 AM, Wichert Akkerman (wich...@wiggy.net) wrote:
On 29 Sep 2014, at 13:58, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Right, this is my perspective as well. The point that the wheel format already
includes a build ordering field was significant because that file naming scheme
has an official specification.
Other commands like bdist_egg, bdist_dumb and bdist_wininst aren't as strict
about the expected file names, although it would be good to define a suggested
optional build numbering convention at least for bdist_egg, such that
easy_install will do the right thing, even if the full source level version
number isn't bumped.
This is just as relevant for sdists as well. It is quite common to see a broken
release due to a missing or wrong MANIFEST.in.
Test them prior to uploading them.
---
Donald Stufft
PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
