On 13 October 2014 11:40, holger krekel <[email protected]> wrote: > and I just noted that the very Python guide on packaging is advertising > using plain --extra-index-url for private packages as well: > > http://docs.python-guide.org/en/latest/shipping/packaging/#personal-pypi
I can see your point here (I'm not sure I agree with it, but that's a separate issue). If you want to propose a patch for the packaging user guide, we can discuss it there. > and, besides the need for fixing the various discussions/pages, i think > that PEP470 should contribute to a more careful discussion of the feature > (it's fine for the actual external linking to existing pypi projects > usecase, mind you). So if I read you correctly, you're saying that the PEP 470 usage of --extra-index-url is fine. That's good. I don't think it's the place of PEP 470 to discuss *other* uses of --extra-index-url. Having an example in there seemed fine to me, but if it brings up issues unrelated to the PEP then I think it's a distraction and should be removed. And I believe that's what has happened. So again, that's good. > And i guess pip should have a warning note in > the option help to help educating users. Again, not for the PEP, but feel free to raise a PR for pip (but once again, I reserve the right to disagree with that PR when it's raised :-)). Paul _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
