On Wed Nov 26 2014 at 9:47:07 PM Takayuki Shimizukawa <shimizuk...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
> On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 23:12:14 Fred Drake <f...@fdrake.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Takayuki Shimizukawa
>> <shimizuk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I'd like to request classifiers for the Sphinx like:
>> >
>> > "Topic :: Documentation :: Sphinx"
>> > "Topic :: Documentation :: Sphinx :: Extension"
>>
>> I suspect adding "Framework :: Sphinx" would make more sense for
>> extensions. For tools used with Sphinx documentation without being
>> tied to the Sphinx application itself, "Topic :: Documentation ::
>> Sphinx" seems fine. (I'd imagine an extension would specify both, and
>> non-extension tools would use only "Topic :: Documentation ::
>> Sphinx".)
>>
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. It make sense to me too.
> How about this?
>
> "Topic :: Documentation :: Sphinx"
> "Framework :: Sphinx"
> "Framework :: Sphinx :: Extension"
> "Framework :: Sphinx :: Theme"
>
Do you have any idea of the number of existing packages that would fit
under each of those categories? I'm only asking because I wonder whether we
need all four right now.
Richard
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
