> On Dec 22, 2014, at 1:15 PM, Vladimir Diaz <vladimir.v.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com > <mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com>> wrote: > On 23 December 2014 at 01:46, Vladimir Diaz <vladimir.v.d...@gmail.com > <mailto:vladimir.v.d...@gmail.com>> wrote: > ::ping:: > > Has anyone in the community gotten a chance to review PEP 458 and/or PEP 480? > Community feedback would be appreciated. > > Sorry about that Vladimir - I think the main PyPA devs have been focused on > getting PEP 440 implemented, and the associated setuptools, pip and > virtualenv updates out the door, and now we're into the end of year holiday > period for many of us. > > Considering that the previous drafts of PEP 458 generated quite a bit of > feedback and questions, I was surprised by the lack of responses this time > around (almost relieved :). Receiving feedback from the main PyP developers > after the holiday period is definitely not a problem. >
This is why I haven’t looked at it yet. --- Donald Stufft PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
