> I agree that from an implementation perspective, this could just be a > new recommended URL in the project URLs metadata (e.g. "Reference > Container Images"). If folks don't think the idea sounds horrible, > I'll make that update to the PEP 459 draft. >
wouldn't this just be a use case for a custom "Metadata Extension", and not something new to put into PEP459? I'm just imagining you won't cover everything that might be needed for automation down the road, and it will end up being an unused field in a few years.
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
