> On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz <gl...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote: > > >> On Oct 14, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> My feeling is that pypi is correct to disallow the mutation of releases once >> they become public, but that the ergonomics around this could probably be >> improved :-). A more general solution that might be nice to have Someday >> would be if you could upload a release in one step, and then get a private >> link to poke at what was uploaded and make sure it looks correct, before >> making it public in a second step. >> > > IMHO it would be really neat if 'pip' could authenticate to PyPI, and the > authentication could affect package visibility, so that you could end-to-end > test 'pip install foo' and ensure that you get what you expect before pushing > the go-live switch.
Can't be done without a pretty huge regression in uptime and speed.
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig