> On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz <gl...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> 
>> My feeling is that pypi is correct to disallow the mutation of releases once 
>> they become public, but that the ergonomics around this could probably be 
>> improved :-). A more general solution that might be nice to have Someday 
>> would be if you could upload a release in one step, and then get a private 
>> link to poke at what was uploaded and make sure it looks correct, before 
>> making it public in a second step.
>> 
> 
> IMHO it would be really neat if 'pip' could authenticate to PyPI, and the 
> authentication could affect package visibility, so that you could end-to-end 
> test 'pip install foo' and ensure that you get what you expect before pushing 
> the go-live switch.

Can't be done without a pretty huge regression in uptime and speed. 
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to