PyPA is very loosely organized and largely volunteer. I do not mind if Mercurial prevents you from submitting a pull request to bdist_wheel. Also before pypa you would have had to visit multiple personal accounts on each service to find the projects.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:22 PM Ian Cordasco <graffatcolmin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Thomas Güttler > <guettl...@thomas-guettler.de> wrote: > > Am 05.11.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Ian Cordasco: > >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Thomas Güttler > >> <guettl...@thomas-guettler.de> wrote: > >>> Am 04.11.2015 um 21:14 schrieb Ian Cordasco: > >>>> As I understand it, some people prefer Mercurial. Those projects tend > >>>> to live on bitbucket. Git projects can live in either place although I > >>>> suspect they tend to live on GitHub instead. > >>> > >>> Is there really a need for this? > >> > >> Is there a need for letting project creators work as they please with > >> the VCS they prefer? Why not if it makes them more efficient > >> maintainers. > > > > If the projects are unrelated then every maintainer should use what > > he prefers. If the projects are related and maintained by one group > (PyPa), > > then there should be **one** hosting platform. - my opinion - > > That's super helpful. Thanks > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig >
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
