You make it sound like there's a plausible alternative to setuptools
entry points -- is there?
02.05.2016, 10:14, Noah Kantrowitz kirjoitti:
The correct way to do that these days is `pip install -e .` AFAIK. Setuptools
should be considered an implementation detail of installs at best, not really
used directly anymore (though entry points are still used by some projects, so
this isn't really a strict dichotomy).
--Noah
On May 2, 2016, at 12:03 AM, Thomas Güttler <guettl...@thomas-guettler.de>
wrote:
I was told this:
`python setup.py develop` uses urllib2 to download distributions whereas pip
uses requests
Souce: http://stackoverflow.com/a/36958874/633961
This can create confusing situations and I want to avoid this.
Is there a way to use only **one** way to install python packages?
Do wheels help here?
Or is there a way to use npm for python packages?
Regards,
Thomas Güttler
--
Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
