On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 May 2016 at 09:40 Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: >> >> >> On May 6, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: >> >> So who is the BDFL on this decision? It seems we need someone to stop the >> bikeshedding on the field name and what file is going to house this >> configuration data. And do we need someone to write a PEP for this proposal >> to have something to target? >> >> >> We need someone to write the PEP and someone to offer to be BDFL for it. >> For this particular change the default would be Nick for BDFL but if he’s >> busy someone else can take it over for this PEP. Though I think we need >> someone writing an actual PEP first. > > > OK, assuming the Nick will be pronouncing, who wants to write the PEP?
I've just been writing up a comparison of the different file formats, partly in case it's useful to others and partly just for my own use in looking at them against each other and seeing how much it actually matters. This might also be reusable for the rationale/rejected-alternatives section of a PEP, if anyone wants it, or I could go ahead and add a few paragraphs to turn it into a proper PEP. -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
