> On May 25, 2016, at 8:22 AM, Thomas Güttler <guettl...@thomas-guettler.de> > wrote: > > > > Am 25.05.2016 um 15:55 schrieb Paul Moore: >> On 25 May 2016 at 14:42, Thomas Güttler <guettl...@thomas-guettler.de> wrote: >>> Am 25.05.2016 um 09:57 schrieb Alex Grönholm: >>>> >>>> Amen to that, but who will pay for it? I imagine a great deal of >>>> processing power would be required for this. >>>> How do implementors of other languages handle this? >>> >>> >>> I talked with someone who is member of the python software foundation, and >>> he said that >>> money for projects like this is available. Of course this was no official >>> statement. >> >> The other aspect of this is who has sufficient time/expertise to set >> something like this up? Are you volunteering to do this? > > I am volunteering for doing coordination work: > - communication > - layout of datastructures > - interchange of datastructures. > - no coding > > But we need at least ten people how say "I'm willing to help"
Short answer: this is not how anything works. Long answer: This is not a question of getting some number of people to help. If you can clone us a small army of Donalds, Nicks, and Richards then we _might_ be able to pull this off. The money isn't the problem per se, it's the human cost in upkeep for a system designed explicitly to run hostile code safely. --Noah
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
