On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Robin Becker <ro...@reportlab.com> wrote: > On 12/10/2016 22:09, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Robin Becker <ro...@reportlab.com> wrote: >>> >>> Any manylinux experts here? >>> > ....... >> >> https://bugs.python.org/issue28092#msg276164 >> >> I suspect that this will get reverted again before 3.6-final given >> that it does in fact cause problems... > > > I prodded that issue with> > > > >>> Don't want to add too much noise, but this issue also affects the >>> manylinux project build compiler (gcc 4.8.2). > > >> STINNER Victor added the comment: >> >> >> Would it be possible to upgrade the "manylinux" compiler (take a more >> recent GCC version)? > > > I'm not the expert here, but I though the whole point was to have a common > denominator system. Is gcc part of the 'commons' or can we use any version > of the compiler provided the other common denominator libs are acceptable to > it?
Replied there: https://bugs.python.org/issue28092#msg278584 -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
