> On Jan 16, 2017, at 11:59 AM, Chris Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> (copied from an email I erroneously sent to python-ideas@)
>
> I think the criteria for reuse of a name must include usage limits; if the
> package is being downloaded on a steady basis by accounts that can't be shown
> to belong to known integration systems, reuse should not be allowed.
I agree, which is why the rules for removal of an abandoned project include the
following:
* download statistics on the Package Index for the existing package
indicate project is not being used;
- Ł
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
