On 24 February 2017 at 11:54, Lele Gaifax <l...@metapensiero.it> wrote: > Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 24 February 2017 at 11:37, Lele Gaifax <l...@metapensiero.it> wrote: >>> Can anyone shed some light on the problem? By what logic buildout used a >>> different name for that particular package? >> >> While I don't know anything about buildout, pyramid-tm is the >> normalised version of pyramid_tm - see >> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0503/#normalized-names > > Oh, I see, thank you. Does that mean that the right thing I should do is > always using such normalized names in my requirements.txt/versions.cfg?
I *think* it shouldn't matter. The problem will likely be with older tools not normalising. So using normalised names throughout might help such tools. Paul _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
