On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 April 2017 at 11:12, Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Bruno Alexandre Rosa >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> We would be very glad to help adding ppc support for manylinux3 :) >> >> I guess if we're going ahead and doing manylinux3 now, then we can >> probably roll in ppc support as part of the same process? > > That was my main feedback on the draft manylinux3-for-ppc64le PEP: > it's so close to also covering the manylinux1 architectures that it > seems more sensible to me to just go ahead and fully define > manylinux3, rather than only doing the ppc64le bits and then needing > to somehow impose architecture restrictions at the PyPI and > installation tool level.
Well, manylinux1 is spec'ed to be x86_64 and i686 only, and we already implemented the supported architectures list in pip: https://github.com/pypa/pip/blob/491294f61e37d766720aead97b4fb008cfc2e51d/pip/pep425tags.py#L146 so that part's not a big deal either way, but it's certainly more efficient to share all the spec and tooling work :-) >> The one >> major hiccup is that our current Travis-CI-based build pipeline won't >> work for ppc, but there's lots of stuff to do before that that could >> be shared and where we'd welcome help (see my other email...) > > It may also be worth getting in touch with the CentOS CI folks about > those aspects: https://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/CI/GettingStarted That page seems to say that for CentOS 7 they only support x86_64? -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
