> On Jul 6, 2017, at 6:55 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 6 July 2017 at 11:26, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I hope you'll reconsider that deprecation - flit is one of only two (AFAIK) >> active attempts at making a saner build tool (enscons being the other one), >> and does have real value I think. > > Agreed. In spite of the fact that I've been part of the pushback > you've had over flit's approach, I nevertheless feel that flit is a > major step forward in providing a user-friendly project packaging tool > for Python. Even if you don't wish to continue developing flit, I hope > that someone takes up the reins and continues to develop the ideas > introduced with flit, of having a straightforward, "do the simplest > thing needed" approach to packaging the majority of projects.
I agree completely. > >> Either way, thanks for all the effort you put in! > > Agreed, and my apologies for any contribution my feedback may have > made to the pressure you felt that led you to this decision. > Likewise. — Donald Stufft
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
