With respect to this issue, if everyone told me that I was wrong then I would say I'm obviously wrong. But some people are saying one thing and other people are saying something else.
On Aug 26, 2017 5:03 PM, "xoviat" <xov...@gmail.com> wrote: > As I said, I don't care what the particular solution is on this issue. > However I'm simply trying to anticipate and resolve potential disagreements > that could drag this out for a significant period of time. It is clear that > Nick and Donald have a disagreement on this issue which is actually not in > and of itself packaging related. The clear way to resolve this was to get a > pronouncement. > > On Aug 26, 2017 4:56 PM, "Nathaniel Smith" <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 2:06 PM, xoviat <xov...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I also think that Guido pretty much ruled out Notimplemented. >> >> As I've said, I don't think it matters a huge deal whether we use >> NotImplemented or not. But please don't treat Guido as some kind of >> pronouncement generating machine where you hurl out-of-context >> questions at him and then use his response as a club to beat down >> discussion. It's rude to Guido, it's rude to Nick and Donald (to whom >> Guido has explicitly delegated his BDFL authority in packaging-related >> matters), and it's rude to everyone trying to discuss proposals on >> their merits. >> >> -n >> >> -- >> Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org >> >
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig