I think that the CPython builds a python executable, then uses that built 
executable to finish the installation.

> On Sep 30, 2017, at 9:11 PM, xoviat <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It would be nice to know whether this information is correct, or whether I 
> hold an invalid belief.
> 
> 2017-09-30 20:09 GMT-05:00 xoviat <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> I have personally not built Python myself (though I've built many an 
> extension), but what I can say is that I got the idea from Larry Hastings. 
> According to him (this if for the Gilectomy fork):
> 
> "Second, as you hack on the Gilectomy you may break your "python" executable 
> rather badly. This is of course expected. However, the python Makefile itself 
> depends on having a working local python interpreter, so when you break that 
> you often break your build too."
> 
> 2017-09-30 19:59 GMT-05:00 Donald Stufft <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> 
> 
>> On Sep 30, 2017, at 3:52 PM, xoviat <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> I don't think CPython needs to bundle all of its build-time dependencies. 
>> That principle doesn't really apply to other Python programs nor most other 
>> programs in general. AFAIK, CPython already has a build-time dependency on 
>> another, external, Python, so it wouldn't be too much to require the 
>> external Python to have setuptools installed with something like 
>> pyproject.toml (other programming languages usually bootstrap themselves 
>> with previous versions of the language along with some associated build 
>> tools).
> 
> As far as I can tell, CPython does *not* have a build time dependency on 
> having Python available. I just spun up a bare alpine linux container and 
> compiled CPython `master` branch on it. As far as I can tell the only Python 
> that exists in this container is the one I just compiled.
> 
> That means that in order for CPython to depend on distutils to build as you 
> indicate, it would also need to start depending on an existing version of 
> Python being available. I don’t think that’s a great idea. I think Python 
> should not depend on Python to build.
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to