I accept PEP 566. Thank you for doing this work. Daniel
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 5:05 PM Dustin Ingram <di@di.codes> wrote: > I've updated the PEP to include the message body as Description. > > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0566/ > > I don't think there are any other outstanding issues, so this should > be ready for Daniel's review. > > Thanks, > D. > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Trishank Kuppusamy > <trishank.kuppus...@datadoghq.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Daniel Holth <dho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hashes do not belong in this PEP, which is intended to do just a little > >> more than document the status quo. The document does provide for future > >> enhancements to the spec without using the PEP process. > >> > >> Personally I am not a fan of putting concrete requirements or hashes of > >> specific archives at this level. > > > > > > Fair enough, just throwing the idea out there! > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig > > > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig >
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
