Fair enough :+1: Let's go ahead with this then.
> For tools (such as pip) where 2a and 2b behave differently, yes it would. But > that's a pip implementation decision which can be made independently of the > resolution of this discussion (the PEP allows either behaviour). The details > of pip's behaviour have been discussed both on this thread and on the related > pip issue that's referenced in this thread. I don't think it's worth > rehashing that discussion again here. If you want to argue that pip should > switch to behaviour 2a, you should pick up the discussion on the pip issue > tracker. But be warned, I'll argue against you over there :-) (Not least > because the legacy behaviour is available using --no-build-isolation, which > is *precisely* for the case where you want to manage the build tools manually > the way you are doing above). -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- distutils-sig@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to distutils-sig-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/distutils-sig@python.org/message/46N2F7WWSGMIQ4JHYKLW424NRQ3QPPGK/
