On 18-Jan-06, at 9:09 PM, Suresh Venkatraman wrote:

A use case document is a good for keeping the proposed WG on track - like
the following for p2p-sip:

http://www.p2psip.org/drafts/draft-bryan-sipping-p2p-usecases-00.txt

A nice piece of work. We did something similar in the LDUP WG.

Should a use case draft be added to the charter milestones?
I think it's worthy, but want to make sure there's sufficient interest
from the group, and someone willing to step up to editing the
draft.

I was looking at a couple of charters when I stated "simplicity" although
the proper term may be clarity:

http://www.xmpp.org/wg-charter.html
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/manet-charter.html

I could wordsmith the text so that the word 'simple' isn't used, but
it seems like a worthy overriding goal to me. Maybe if I drill into
what simple means? Simplicity in the order of... for the user,  for
 the relying party, and finally for the agent implementor. (I think
I offered that up an other email to this list earlier in the week.)

(BTW: I agree that Agent and User Agent is unfortunate naming...)

John


_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix

Reply via email to