On 1/20/2006 3:01 PM, "John Merrells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 20-Jan-06, at 10:40 AM, Peter Davis wrote: > >> 2 drafts. One for the core specification, the >> other for the particular transport binding the wg feels is most >> likely to see adoption (or has unfulfilled requirements), which may be >> HTTP > That's the approach the charter is taking at the moment. > In draft #2 I called out the expected documents that would > come out of a WG and they're in the milestone section. > Is the text not clear on that? More likely a case of the aging eyes ;-) 2 drafts +1 =peterd _______________________________________________ dix mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
