On 27-Feb-06, at 3:11 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
The above sort of exchange is a good one, among specialists in the
identity and x.500 kind of world.
Unfortunately, it is not so useful for the larger community that is
expected to implement or *use* these services.
Yet those are the folk who will adopt or not adopt the output of
the working group.
If the working group's planned output cannot be described in a way
that such folk will a) understand, and b) see immediate need for,
then the dix working group will be another marginalized standards
effort.
It seems to me that your comments are somewhat disassociated from the
work we've done so far. How about you work through the draft charter
#4 and annotate the bits that you have issue with?
John
_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
