On 14-Mar-06, at 10:53 AM, Pete Rowley wrote:
John Merrells wrote:
I've been playing with describing a digitally signed third-party
claim in SAML
and moving that over dmd1. I've mapped what I think should be in a
claim
into the SAMLv2 schema... but I'm not sure it's exactly right.
Also, I believe
it's out of scope for DIX, but I want to ensure that this
functionality can be
layered on top. How about an off-list conversation to discuss this?
Is it really out of scope? DIX would need to be capable of
carrying such traffic so I think it is useful to demonstrate
methods of doing so, if for nothing else than to be sure that it
can be done.
We'll that's my intent, I'm just not sure the details of the
conversation should be
here. Here I'd like to focus on the moving things about aspects
without worrying
too much about what the things are.
John
_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
