On 19-Mar-06, at 8:46 AM, Robert Yates wrote:

Dick Hardt wrote:

great, but I just want to clarify a point. dmd1 today can move around all this identity data. The reason that dmd1 doesn't yet fulfill our requirements is that it moves it too late in this process for it to be useful to us. We need the data moved the moment that a space owner adds a new user to the space.

To echo John's comments, why do you need this?

When the space administrator adds a new member to the space, the following things currently happen. Note that at this point in time the new member is no where in sight.

1) The new member gets added to the access control for the space.
2) The new member is e-mailed with a welcome message and a link to the space. 3) The new member's contact details e.g. phone number, e-mail address, jabber id are available to other space members from the space's membership list.

Note also that there are some space members that log into the space extremely infrequently and with the advent of feeds some may never log into the space via a browser. They're just "observers" of what is taking place. However it is important that their contact details be available to other members of the space.

Ok, I think I understand your use case.

Essentially you are saying that someone can be added to a space without their permission? :-)

Seriously though, I'm sure there are situations where your use case makes sense. In order to solve the other aspects of the identity problem, I would expect that server to server communication would currently be out of scope


I think to move the data as you describe, a tight coupling between all parties is required.

Not sure why you think the coupling is any tighter than the coupling between a homesite and membersite. We're just requesting a set of user properties.

The site with the data MUST trust the site requesting the data. ie, there is an existing relationship between them. In dmd1, the membersite and homesite don't need to have any prior relationship, and the user can use one homesite one day, and another another day


do you envision a future draft with the "lookup" capability? in the use case, as described, the identity data is needed and the user is not around to present it.


Would be interested in hearing use cases for where this is needed where the user had not already been there.

see above. We want the user's properties to move when the space admin adds them to the membership list, so we can send them an e- mail, and so that their contact details are available to others. This is how the products work today, the difference is that today all the members are in the corporate LDAP and so the application just "pulls" the data from there.

Sounds like LDAP is a solution now. Why not keep using it?


The Homesite is the users agent for managing their data. Liberty deployments typically combine the identifier authentication and property assertion operations. DIX is wanting to separate those so that you can provide third party claims from many authoritative sites in a single request, and that the Homesite does NOT need to be trusted.

ie. AT&T may claim that my persona has a phone number, VeriSign that I have a specific email address, and Air Canada that I am Star Alliance Gold. Company X needs to trust AT&T, VeriSign and Star Alliance -- but not my Homesite.

k, sorry, have been slow at grasping this fact (as demonstrated by an earlier posting of mine), thanks for the explanation.
Rob

p.s. I notice this statement in the DIX charter.

"The end-user should have control over their identity information and always be providing consent for the exchange of any of their information."

I just wonder whether this holds true in the corporation to corporation use cases. In these instances it is the end-user's corporation that provides consent for the exchange of their employee's identity information. I think this is an important distinction from the consumer space.

I agree there are differences. I have found this useful discussion.

-- Dick


_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix

Reply via email to