RE: SAML and REST - was Re: [dix] DIX use cases

Suresh Venkatraman Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:05:03 -0800

Disagree - DIX should work with any HTTP/1.1 UA, not just a browser. Is there a dependency on processing HTML in DIX?

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SAML and REST - was Re: [dix] DIX use cases

No! I think the intended scope of DIX is to work within the existing HTTP capabilities. In fact, DIX is intended to work in an HTML/browser environment, rather than in non-HTML applications such as WEBDAV or even browser-based AJAX schemes.

I'd like to discuss changes to HTTP somewhere, but probably not on the DIX list.

Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: Carsten Bormann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Digital Identity Exchange <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:35:39 -0600
Subject: Re: SAML and REST - was Re: [dix] DIX use cases

Do we really need to change HTTP for DIX?

Gruesse, Carsten

_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix

_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix

RE: SAML and REST - was Re: [dix] DIX use cases

Reply via email to