On 29-Mar-06, at 9:25 AM, Robert Yates wrote:
The usability of the claims stuff worries me. The use cases are
all written with the user previously acquiring a claim. What is
the user experience if the user visits a site that requires a claim
and the user does not have a claim. Are they sent to the
appropriate site to get the claim? Will most users understand what
a claim is? or does this all need to seemlessly happen? I think a
use case that outlines this scenario should be added.
e.g.
Beth gives her friend, [EMAIL PROTECTED], access to her photos.
Adam receives an email from Beth inviting him to view her photos.
He goes to the site, which requests a verified email claim. His
identity agent does not presently have such a claim. His identity
agent retrieves the required claim from his e-mail provider. His
identity agent then presents this claim and gains access to the
photos Beth has published for him.
There may also be some use cases around expired claims that I think
need to be present if claims are going to receive appropriate
coverage.
Both good points. I'll add use cases for them.
I've not documented Lisa and Rob's non-browser based use cases for
DIX
over HTTP and other protocols, as I'm not necessarily familiar
enough with
each case to do them justice. I would however encourage the group to
write them up though. Volunteers?
I'll take a stab at some.
Super. I'll fold those into the draft when they're done.
John
_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
