Hi. As far as I can tell, the use cases draft does an excellent job of describing all the possible things that could work in this space. I think it is important to do a much better job of describing which use cases you actually see as important in the first version.
I think that many of the use cases that involve communications between the identity agent and parties who identity claims have been given to in the past should be ruled out of scope a they hugely complicate the solution. I also think that it is unlikely that Beth will have a single identity agent. For example if Beth works for the NSA, I doubt they will let her use the same identity agent for her work persona as for her home persona. I think the implications of this for use cases need to be explored. I really like the draft though as it allows me to concretely understand what we're talking about here. _______________________________________________ dix mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
