>I much prefer this idea to the proposals involving XMLHttpRequest. We >can include the language definitions dictionary file with code like >this:
Had a look at my posting with the sample implementation? It's exactly that what I do - delivering a dictionary with a few helper (that surprisingly look like gettext) functions. XHR was my first idea to deliver the lib, but I think this way is much more stable over different browsers. Only difference is, I would create the library dynamically, so that in the background we could use the same management tools that are already used for language handling (make-messages.py, compile-messages.py). The po/mo files are only used to store the translations, though, as JS won't see them - it will see just a big, fat assotiatvie array. bye, Georg
