On 12/6/05, Maniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But still you have to blindly copy strings from code to decorator > parameters.
Any way of implementing this is going to require you to specify *somewhere* which GET parameters are relevant to caching a particular view, and it'd be hard to implement that directly in the view syntax (since not everyone will be using caching). The proposed decorator does the next best thing to having it directly "in" the view, and keeps that information bundled with your view code instead of storing it somewhere else. So it gets a +1 from me. And while DRY is great, I'm still not convinced that this is a violation of it, or at least one we need to worry too much about -- if strictly following DRY means needlessly complicating things, then I don't think it should be strictly followed. -- "May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house." -- George Carlin
