On 12/7/05, Robert Wittams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is just horrible. Sorry. The point is not to treat python as some > arbitrary data format that might have some relationship to your objects > : the point is to define classes that act as normally as possible and > are stored in a database.
Haha, alright... Interesting critique. So in essence it's too Rational and not enough OO for you? I don't think you can have these magical "classes that act as normally as possible" when it comes to this. You have to make some compromise somewhere along the way; this just a different compromise.
