"Colin Howlett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > If as Eugene says, we're not interested really in visual effects, then > perhaps we should choose something smaller, like prototype.js or > tw-sack.js (just 4 lines of js to retrieve an html fragment from a URL > and replace an element with the the fragment).
I didn't say we are not interested in visual effects. I said it should be left outside of the scope --- Django has nothing to do with it. All flashy client-side stuff should be supplied by 3rd party library. Of course, if somebody wants to do their own Ajax library, it's their responsibility to maintain all required effects. Thanks, Eugene
