Hi all, On 12/28/05, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given that the (relatively) new Q() syntax for query construction > doesn't require the top level kwarg, doesn't it make sense to allow > unnamed *opts parameters as well as **kwargs in query functions? Following the overwhelming response (accompanied by the sound of crickets chirping in the distance :-), I've worked up a patch that implements this change. It's logged as Ticket #1133. Given that all the DB stuff is about to change, the patch is against the magic-removal branch (which, by the way, is looking really good - kudos to all concerned). Yours, Russ Magee
