>However, I don't like it if it's going to be introduced as a scaling
>solution; I'd rather have the various tiers of infrastructure (load
>balancing at the front, application in the middle, database in the
>back) remain as loosely coupled as possible.

Absolutly, scaling is the last reason to introduce it and is not in
anyway why it a such feature gap. As mentioned, there are dozens of
scenarios in modern cororations where you have access multiple
databases. I could a several tens. Take the company I work at now. We
have an ERP system in oracle. The ERP system itself splits its data in
3 seperate instances (SYSTEM/CONTROL/DATA). We then have business
intellgence system. We have EDI systems. We have a zillion dodgy access
databases. We have home grown maintaince systems. A lot of the
requirements for building websites is to show data from multiple of
these systems. While this can be done with pure SQL now, it would be
nicer if it could done through the ORM because of all the benefits that
brings in Django.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to