On Friday 02 June 2006 17:15, Bill de hÓra wrote: > Luke, > > I summarized this as: > > Adrian/Jacob pick some people they trust to eval/weed patches. Those > people recommend patches for consideration. That way some of the work > is farmed out, but core technical decisions stay centralised. > > is that it?
That's almost it, except you put about a million times better :-) I would just add that I think there should be a process/order for looking at patches to ensure they do get looked at, and a specific aim to to have *some* comment on a patch within a certain period of time. Luke -- "Underachievement: The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower." (despair.com) Luke Plant || L.Plant.98 (at) cantab.net || http://lukeplant.me.uk/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
