Tom Tobin wrote: > On 7/27/06, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In line with other sentiments I've expressed here in the past: IMHO, > this means your *project manager* is addled, not Django's release > process. If you can understand that the development version is stable > enough to use, but your project manager can't, your project manager > doesn't deserve his title. :p You are criticising a project manager that isn't confortable using a development svn branch in a production envirment. WOW. You are a moron! First, the django developers are quite egotistical if they are claiming that there nightly .95 build is stable, when at any time they could introduce a bug. The whole point of a release is to do proper testing and you can say "yes, we froze the code and did tons of testing so we feel it is stable". NOT "yeah i hack it everynight and I'm so awsome i never write a single bug (and my poop doesn't stink -- James Bennett)". I thought the whole point of .95 was to get the framework where there wouldn't be any backward incompatabilitys example(meta.blah vs model.blah), not a feature race. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
